The effects of genetic deterioration might be mitigated by gene flow. That is, by bringing unrelated wolves, from possibly Minnesota or Ontario, to Isle Royale. This possibility raises the question: Should such mitigation should be attempted?.
Because wolves often kill non-territorial wolves, such mitigation could be technically challenging. However, the appropriateness of an attempt also depends on important, unresolved ethical issues.
Rolf Peterson discusses some of these issues in his 1995 book, Broken Balance (reprinted in 2008 by University of Michigan Press). Then the intention was to better understand the appropriateness of reintroduction should Isle Royale wolves go extinct. That discussion focused on (i) the aesthetic and scientific values of perpetuating a predator-prey system largely unaffected by humans, and (ii) how to balance mandates associated with Isle Royale’s designation as U. S. Federal Wilderness, which values minimizing human intervention but also values actively mitigating past anthropogenic effects. In 1995, Rolf Peterson took for granted the appropriateness of not intervening while wolves persisted in order to maximize the prospect of improved scientific understanding of population viability in small populations.
Assessing the appropriateness of bringing new wolves to Isle Royale now seems complicated by several new considerations. First, we now know genetic deterioration has, at least, compromised the anatomy of these wolves. Given current knowledge about population viability and the non-experimental circumstances characterizing Isle Royale, as much scientific insight might be gained by assessing the potential effects of genetic rescue as from continuing to observe the effects of population isolation.
Second, the potential benefits of gene flow to wolves may be unexpectedly detrimental to the viability of wolf-moose interactions on Isle Royale. That is, because ticks and other factors associated with climate warming have been increasingly impacting moose, a more vigorous wolf population could be importantly detrimental to moose. Third, genetic deterioration now seems to have been causing individual wolves to suffer – suffering that might be mitigated by intervention.
Any decision about intervening on Isle Royale seems to involve balancing the value of basic scientific knowledge, health of ecological collectives (i.e., population viability and ecosystem health), the welfare of individual animals, and what is taken to be a virtue for wilderness areas, non-intervention. In this way, the Isle Royale case is an example of a general and profound challenge for environmental ethics.